“For myself, I want no advantage over my fellow man, and if he is weaker than I, all the more is it my duty to help him.” —Eugene V. Debs
Friday, December 31, 2010
two Winsor McKay cartoons about a path not taken
He was right about the wastefulness of war:

And he knew that refusing to intervene did not mean refusing to help:

Both images from Golden Age Comic Book Stories.
quote of the day: Doug Lain
From Ideology in Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood « The Writings of Douglas Lain
America in Decline
Thursday, December 30, 2010
male feminists of the 1840s: Friederich Engels and Frederick Douglass
"If the rule of the wife over her husband—a natural consequence of the factory system—is unnatural, then the former rule of the husband over the wife must also have been unnatural."From Wikipedia's entry on Frederick Douglass:
In 1848, Douglass attended the first women's rights convention, the Seneca Falls Convention, as the only African American.[12] Elizabeth Cady Stanton asked the assembly to pass a resolution asking for women's suffrage.[13] Many of those present opposed the idea, including influential Quakers James and Lucretia Mott.[14] Douglass stood and spoke eloquently in favor; he said that he could not accept the right to vote himself as a black man if woman could not also claim that right. Douglass projected that the world would be a better place if women were involved in the political sphere. "In this denial of the right to participate in government, not merely the degradation of woman and the perpetuation of a great injustice happens, but the maiming and repudiation of one-half of the moral and intellectual power of the government of the world."[14] Douglass's powerful words rang true with enough attendees that the resolution passed.[15]
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
Emma Bull: "Madonna of the Midway" live
YouTube - Emma Bull in Concert at GaFilk11 #02
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Monday, December 27, 2010
Emma Bull: "Raven in the Storm" live
YouTube - Emma Bull in Concert at GaFilk11 #05
The song is by John Gorka. He's great.
Time to tweak Marx's class analysis?
But as the economic income and wealth gap increases, I'm wondering if Marx's three main classes (bourgeoisie, petit bourgeoisie, proletarian) need a fourth: the gros proletariat, the workers with super-salaries.
Hmm.
So, uh, nevermind. Just thinking on my keyboard.
Income Inequality and the 'Superstar Effect' - NYTimes.com:
Ultimately, the question is this: How much inequality is necessary? It is true that the nation grew quite fast as inequality soared over the last three decades. Since 1980, the country’s gross domestic product per person has increased about 69 percent, even as the share of income accruing to the richest 1 percent of the population jumped to 36 percent from 22 percent. But the economy grew even faster — 83 percent per capita — from 1951 to 1980, when inequality declined when measured as the share of national income going to the very top of the population.
One study concluded that each percentage-point increase in the share of national income channeled to the top 10 percent of Americans since 1960 led to an increase of 0.12 percentage points in the annual rate of economic growth — hardly an enormous boost. The cost for this tonic seems to be a drastic decline in Americans’ economic mobility. Since 1980, the weekly wage of the average worker on the factory floor has increased little more than 3 percent, after inflation.
Frank Capra, rightwing jerk
Sunday, December 26, 2010
a comics panel for Emma
ETA: For folks who don't know Emma, I should add that this panel is not always appropriate. But on a day like today, when holiday items go on clearance....
retweet: corporate censorship, academic spine
The demand: http://bit.ly/h3n4Pb & the smackdown: http://bit.ly/g1vhpd If only more academics had such spine (h/t @Glinner & @TheBrowser)
"as American as Red Indians"
Saturday, December 25, 2010
Speed review: True Grit
Friday, December 24, 2010
Why do Americans claim to be more religious than they are?
Thursday, December 23, 2010
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Palestinian recognition
On December 17, Bolivia extended diplomatic recognition to the State of Palestine within its full pre-1967 borders (all of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem). Coming soon after the similar recognitions by Brazil and Argentina, Bolivia's recognition brought to 106 the number of UN member states recognizing the State of PalestineThat number is amazing. I don't remember any states recognizing the Confederacy, and I think Tibet was only formally recognized by one tiny neighbor, Mongolia. (Yes, Tibet and the Confederacy sent out ambassadors and did their best to act as if they were nations, but formal recognition eluded them.)
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Class Politics at Harvard
In Harvard, which I think takes 40% legacy students (other colleges take more and won’t even reveal the figures), 9% of students are black – but only 7% are poor. Michaels uses the outrage over the recent arrest of Professor Gates in Harvard as indicative of the fact that anti-racism and anti-discrimination enables the elite to feel better about the possession of its wealth – if discrimination against peple is removed, then their wealth is because of their talent, not structural inequality. And the poor deserve to be poor.ETA: See Bill Colsher's comment below; there're problems with this claim. I dunno if the Garibaldy writer was sloppy or Michaels is wrong. I'm inclined to think the former; I know my blogging is sloppier than what I write to sell. I'll try to follow up on this sometime.
a little about Commie Santa
I never remember believing in Santa, and even as a eight-year old, I remember it making me so angry that these kids were told that Santa brought toys based on who was “good,” knowing very well the kid who was going to get the most toys under the tree was the one kid in the class who deserved coal, and the sweet girl who appeared neglected might not get anything.
Another friend of mine, Tammy Nelson, reflected on her childhood to me, “I always loved Santa, but was baffled every year when the neighbor brats got a ton of cool stuff from Santa, and I got much less, and I was really, really good! …I always felt like somehow, I had done something wrong.”
It seems it still reflects in how we view the world as adults. We see rich people as more talented, intelligent, and generally deserving of their wealth, even if they acquired their wealth on the backs of people they mistreated. We’re grown-ups who still believe that those who are most deserving get the most toys, and if we don’t have everything we want, we must be at fault. And that is perhaps even more sad than an unanswered letter to Santa.I'm of several minds on this. An argument can be made that it's good to tell kids Santa exists because that soon teaches them that adults lie now and then. And I love that Santa wears red and gives without expecting anything in return, like any commie. But there's no denying that under capitalism, Santa is forced to be extremely unfair. So far, Krampus is winning.
Haley Barbour and Racism
Rather than resorting to terrorism, the “town leaders” of the Citizens Councils used more genteel methods to punish African Americans who dared demand civil rights. When black parents in Yazoo filed petitions to desegregate county schools, the Citizens Council took out a full-page newspaper add with their names and addresses. The same information, Dittmer writes, was posted on placards in every store in town. All the signatories with white employers lost their jobs. The self-employed were subject to punishing boycotts: One grocer, for example, left the state after distributors destroyed his business by refusing to sell to him.The last is the kind of thing that drove my family out of Levy County in the '60s. It may be why I tend to be suspicious of any attempt to silence anyone for their beliefs, no matter how much I disagree with them.
Monday, December 20, 2010
Sunday, December 19, 2010
Frederick Douglass on slave songs
Saturday, December 18, 2010
three questions @jsmooth995 @sadydoyle
(If you're thinking of the selective quotes at Coffeeandink's site, my reply is here. The short version: In all of those cases, I was pointing out class to people who were ignoring it.)
2. You love to talk about other people's privilege, but you don't talk about your own class privilege. A quick google reveals that Jay Smooth attended some private schools, and Sady Doyle has articles published by mags that are, in your terms, institutionally classist, where the percentage of writers from expensive private schools is remarkably disproportionate. What private schools were you privileged to attend?
3. Can you provide any links to any of your work where you discuss class in any depth?
Respectfully,
Will
Nope, not embarrassing for Michael Moore
Frederick Douglass on house niggers and politicians
Friday, December 17, 2010
things Andrea Dworkin has said
"No woman needs intercourse; few women escape it."
"Seduction is often difficult to distinguish from rape. In seduction, the rapist often bothers to buy a bottle of wine."
"Men are sexually predatory in life; and women are sexually manipulative."
"A commitment to sexual equality with males is a commitment to becoming the rich instead of the poor, the rapist instead of the raped, the murderer instead of the murdered."
"Penetrative intercourse is, by its nature, violent."
"Intercourse is the pure, sterile, formal expression of men's contempt for women."
"Violation is a synonym for intercourse."
Thursday, December 16, 2010
Time to leave Blogger? Plus, what's the true self?
I'm thinking about shutting down this old blog and just doing Facebook and Twitter. I dunno if that would mean I would blog less, but I might blog differently. I'm not crazy about Facebook, but I like its commenting system better than Blogger's.
And I like one aspect of its culture a great deal: you're expected to use your legal name there. I think that makes commenters a litte more, well, human. There's a saying by Oscar Wilde that I dislike because it's incomplete: "Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth." Sometimes that's true. Other times, masked people take on personas that are less themselves. To use possibly outdated psychology terms, the masked self can be either id or superego. The true self is the gestalt self.
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
fair world update: if we shared the wealth and income
The world’s 4.4 billion adults, notes the new Credit Suisse research, now hold $194.5 trillion in wealth. That’s enough, if shared evenly across the globe, to guarantee every adult in the world a $43,800 net worth.Lately, I've been thinking about sharing income. Wikipedia came through: World economy says every person in the world would get $10,500 (GDP/PPP).
Which means Emma and I would have a net worth of $87,600, and we would get $20,500 a year. Assume universal health care and good public transportation, and life would be sweet.
corporate censorship is not better than government censorship
I totally disagree with the Manhattan Declaration. But I disagree more with censoring them. Oh, Apple, please stop censoring folks or stop making toys that I want.
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Monday, December 13, 2010
Noam Chomsky is rich
I admire Chomsky, but he doesn't really interest me. I think academics and theorists are important, but they lose sight of one of Marx's most important observations: "Philosophers have hitherto only interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it."
Well. We all have a little hypocrite in us. Just makes us human.
via The Crow's Eye: The Noam.
Barenaked Ladies - "God Rest Ye Merry Gentlemen/We Three Kings"
via David Emerson, who says, "merges into "We 3 Kings" with guest vocalist Sarah McLachlan."
Sunday, December 12, 2010
Long Haired Radical Socialist Jew, and more!
via Vitamin Cyrano, who also mentioned:
Loreena McKennitt- God Rest Ye Merry, Gentlemen
And because you can't have too much Oi! The Vandals - Oi! To The World
Saturday, December 11, 2010
a commie quote from Shakespeare
Doing more murder in this loathsome world,
Than these poor compounds that thou mayst not sell." —Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet
more cool Christmas songs
YouTube - Coil - Christmas Is Now Drawing Near
lyrics: Oi To The World Lyrics - No Doubt. This may be the best Christmas song ever.
too scary not to share
Friday, December 10, 2010
I have permission to post on javalina days
Tonight, a little after dark, Emma and I went over to a neighbor's to pick up a package of theirs, 'cause they're away for a couple of days and couldn't change the delivery date. As we came toward it, Emma said, "Do you smell skunk?"
That should've been a major hint.
I smelled something, but it wasn't strong. I forget my boring answer. I shone the flashlight on the package and started for it.
Something barked.
Well, not exactly, but just as my brain had first said "skunk", it now said "wild dog."
I stepped back toward Emma, and a javalina walked out from the bushes, heading away from us. He may be a loner living in the area. I should check to see if young males live alone. He's probably the loner I've seen the last couple of times. Or maybe he was just away from the other ten when we saw him alone.
But since I saw a javalina, I'm posting. Here are a couple of Friday night videos from my kind of people:
YouTube - 15 year old Tells Establishment to Stick-it.
YouTube - An Irishman abroad tells it like it is !! :-)
Thursday, December 9, 2010
beloved reader, is this my last blog post of 2010?
Advice that I hope you don't need: Never hesitate to tell people you love that you love them.
Bonus advice: When people are near the ends of their lives, they regret things they didn't do more than things they didn't have.
Since I'm not sure how soon I'll blog again (in theory, Jan 1, 2011, but perhaps tomorrow or never), I want to say I love you all like family. In a few cases, very annoying family, but still, humanity is one family, and even its annoying members should be treated with respect and love.
Have some hippie wisdom: Sly & The Family Stone - Everyday People
yes, Julian Assange is a journalist
It's all quibbling. Journalists present information about the world. Some try blatantly to interpret it, some try subtly. Some interpret it with their choices of information. It's all journalism--it's all the news that the journaler thinks is fit to print. Assange deserves every consideration that any journalist deserves.
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
Assange: not a cad, but a rapist?
I'm completely on the side of "no means no." But I'm also on the side of believing not all wrongs can be addressed by the law.
just don't talk to me about Obama
But it's past time for anyone who pretends to be leftish to give up on him. Robert Reich is right: (The President's Last Stand Is No Stand At All: Why the Tax Deal is an Abomination).
A few cartoons from Mike Flugennock:
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Assange: not a rapist, but a cad
Monday, December 6, 2010
Uprooting the Bedouins of Israel
The practice of planting forests in an attempt to Judaize more territory is by no means new. Right after Israel's establishment in 1948, the JNF planted millions of trees to cover up the remains of Palestinian villages that had been destroyed during or after the war. The objective was to help ensure that the 750,000 Palestinian residents who either fled or were expelled during the war would never return to their villages and to suppress the fact that they had been the rightful owners of the land before the State of Israel was created. Scores of Palestinian villages disappeared from the landscape in this way, and the grounds were converted into picnic parks, thus helping engender a national amnesia regarding the Palestinian Nakba.
a story from Terri Windling's child abuse anthology
Sunday, December 5, 2010
Neoliberalism: Diversity and Inequality
Bobby Seale, the co-founder of the Black Panther movement in 1966, warned his comrades: “Those who want to obscure the struggle with ethnic differences are the ones who are aiding and maintaining the exploitation of the masses of the people: poor whites, poor blacks, browns, red Indians, poor Chinese and Japanese... We do not fight exploitative capitalism with black capitalism. We fight capitalism with basic socialism.” Now, with the rise of Obama, we still don’t fight capitalism with black capitalism, we try to save capitalism with black capitalism.
Not content with pretending that our real problem is cultural difference rather than economic difference, we have even begun to treat economic difference as though it were a form of cultural difference. What is expected of the upper middle class today is that we show ourselves to be more respectful of the poor, and that we stop acting as if things like our superior educations really make us superior.
And once we succeed in convincing ourselves that the poor are people who need our respect more than they need our money, our own attitude towards them becomes the problem to be solved, and not their poverty. We can now devote our reforms not to removing class but to eliminating what we Americans call “classism.” The trick is to analyse inequality as a consequence of our prejudices rather than of our social system, and thus replace the pain of giving up some of our money with the comparative pleasure of giving up (along with our classism) our racism, sexism, and homophobia.
about that Facebook meme
Facebook Activism isn’t just stupid; it’s dangerous. It convinces people that doing next to nothing is actually better than doing nothing at all.via theJBRU
Saturday, December 4, 2010
the white poor pay the price of diversity
...which whites were most disadvantaged by the process: the downscale, the rural and the working-class.White, Poor and Ignored? | Poverty in America | Change.org:
This was particularly pronounced among the private colleges in the study. For minority applicants, the lower a family’s socioeconomic position, the more likely the student was to be admitted. For whites, though, it was the reverse. An upper-middle-class white applicant was three times more likely to be admitted than a lower-class white with similar qualifications.
If we assume that poor whites are more likely to populate these rural communities, statistics point to a disproportionately low amount of money being distributed to assist these areas. For example, The Ford Foundation, which purports to be active in rural development, made just $68 million in active grants and loans to rural areas in its fiscal 2006, out of $360 million overall in the U.S. Also, according to a study by the Foundation Center, North Dakota was awarded $3.3 million from foundations, South Dakota $3.2 million and Montana $10 million — compared with $3 billion for New York and $2 billion for California in 2005. While North Dakota may experience the lowest unemployment rates in the country, residents there still must deal with growing poverty and homelessness.
The poet Emma Lazarus once said, "Until we are all free, we are none of us free.
Ron Paul on free speech
“In a free society we're supposed to know the truth,” Paul said. “In a society where truth becomes treason, then we're in big trouble. And now, people who are revealing the truth are getting into trouble for it.”
Friday, December 3, 2010
Damn. I *am* too old for this shit.
First, on the big road trip...TMI warning...I got an annoying hemorrhoid. Too much sitting, too little fiber in my food. I ate better and walked more, and that problem went away.
But on the last day of the trip, I decided to gut through a neck ache 'cause I wanted to get home ASAP. And now I'm hobbling around with a painfully stiff upper back.
This may mean less blogging. Though every time I say something may mean less blogging, I end up blogging more....
By the by. This doesn't really mean I'm too old for long road trips. But I'll eat more conscientiously and stretch more often on the next one.
Thursday, December 2, 2010
Buddhism and violence #2
Making Violence Buddhist- Benjamin SchonthalIn a recent Sightings column Martin E. Marty drew attention to a feature of Buddhism that many Americans find startling: there are Buddhist texts that seem to legitimate war. Marty’s observation contravenes a commonly-held belief that Buddhism is exclusively a religion of peace, one whose tenets reject the use of violence. Yet, Buddhism hasn’t always enjoyed this reputation. Victorian-era Orientalists saw Buddhism as a religion of pessimism, self-denial, even life-abnegating rejection of the world. During World War II, Buddhism was identified by some as motivating Japanese kamikaze pilots.More recently, Buddhism’s pacific nature has been impugned by followers of events in Sri Lanka who observe that, over the course of the island’s thirty-year civil war, Buddhist terms and themes were invoked regularly by hawkish Sinhalese politicians to call for more aggressive military action against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). For example, in an interview on the BBC in March 2009, Keheliya Rambukwella, the spokesman for the Sri Lankan Ministry of Defense described the government’s military campaign against the LTTE as follows: “Our exercise is noble because we need to eradicate the source of human suffering. When you are on a noble path there are certain sacrifices that we all do to uproot the cause of suffering.”The quote is striking because it uses Buddhist idioms to describe military action. Rhetorically, the statement links the Sri Lankan army’s offensive to the core ethical doctrine taught by the Buddha in the Pali Tipitika, the four “noble truths” which Buddhists must follow to achieve enlightenment. Rambukwella’s statement equates the LTTE with dukkha, the phenomenon of worldly suffering which Buddhist practice aims to overcome. It links the course of military operations with steps along the noble eightfold path, the system of moral action and mental cultivation that the Buddha preached to his followers. In short, it describes the war with the LTTE as analogous or equivalent to the pursuit of Buddhist religious goals.Does Rambukwella’s statement represent a distortion of Buddhist doctrine or one, among many, possible interpretations? To answer either way seems unsatisfactory. By dismissing the spokesman’s statement as illegitimate (a cynical, instrumental use of Buddhism), one exempts Buddhist ideas of any complicity in rationalizing or moralizing violence. By treating the spokesman’s statement as a bona fide expression of Buddhist piety, one normalizes a rather idiosyncratic, not to mention non-traditional, use of Buddhist concepts.One solution is to bring human actors and religious institutions back into the picture. After all, it is not religion that acts. Humans map religious concepts onto violent actions through discourse. As Mark Juergensmeyer and others have pointed out, there is an undeniable convenience to so doing: religious concepts are suitable justifications for violence because war provides a congenial metaphor for piety. Buddhism is no different. Self-cultivation in Buddhism as in other religious traditions is conceived as struggle. Buddhist virtue is understood as defeating craving, desire, and ignorance. It only takes a short interpretive leap to homologize ethical struggle to physical conflict.What distinguishes the Sri Lankan defense spokesman’s use of Buddhist ideas from, for example, that of the Dalai Lama is not the validity of his interpretation, but its relationship to authorized institutions through which Buddhist texts, practices and concepts are glossed, transmitted and (re)produced. We may thus say that Rambukwella’s translating of military action into Buddhist idioms may be interpretively valid, but it is not authorized by most Buddhist ecclesiastical institutions in Sri Lanka. Similarly, the September 11 hijackers mustered an interpretation of Islam which may have some valid scriptural referents, but which is not authorized by most of the world’s Muslim institutions.Why then has Buddhism tended to be exculpated from links with violence in popular media while Islam has not? One difference lies in how Western media have depicted the two religions as institutions. Islam is routinely presented as a singular, unified, institutionally-coherent religion with the possible exception of the Sunni-Shi’a split. Buddhism, on the other hand, is presented as anti-institutional, a religion of individual, self-guided practitioners. Using these models, popular media interpret Muslims’ actions deductively, as reflecting the dictates of some monolithic Islam, while interpreting Buddhists’ actions inductively, as expressing the actors’ own, personal views about Buddhism. Media outlets thus allow Buddhists more interpretive diversity, making it more difficult for a single Buddhist to be seen to speak for Buddhism as a whole. Of course, this discursive binary is wildly inaccurate. But it has remarkable power and persistence in popular culture.In thinking about religion and politics—and violence is politics continued by other means, as the saying goes—we must be cautious not to lose sight of the people who are acting, and to examine closely their relationship with complex and heterogeneous institutions of religious authority. We also must take seriously the speech act. Under what circumstance are actors permitted by audiences to speak for a religious tradition? To do so is to recognize that there are no predetermined links between Buddhism or Islam—or any religion—and violence. It is people who link them.Benjamin Schonthal is a PhD candidate in History of Religions and a Martin Marty Center Junior Fellow.
The downside of diversity
The problem with talking about "diversity" is it's meaningless without an acknowledgment of the c-word.
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
the Shirky Principle, and the Shetterly Addition
To which I'll add: When the problem has been solved, institutions dedicated to solving it will find it where it does not exist.
Monday, November 29, 2010
Saturday, November 27, 2010
Friday, November 26, 2010
Hari Kunzru on freedom of speech
The third area of concern for us as writers is the use of language to produce identity. In the European context this is particularly crucial, as the economic crisis is immiserating large numbers of people, who are - as always in European history - turning towards xenophobia and atavistic nationalism in the hope of identifying an enemy more tangible than global capital.
It seems to me that multiculturalism, once a useful and progressive kind of politics, is no longer functioning as well as it did. The limits of identity politics are becoming clear. Instead of a playful, creative blending of the best of host and migrant cultures, the terms of multiculturalism are increasingly used by cultural conservatives of all stripes to police cultural boundaries. A liberal politics of absolute inclusivity, while presenting itself as pragmatic, has the disadvantage of obscuring genuine differences and antagonisms. Identity politics, which privileges categories like race and religion, is wilfully silent about class. Culture is, self-evidently, at the heart of this, and so we as writers have a central role to play. It sickens me to watch European bigots puffing up their chests about the values of the Enlightenment, as a badge of their superiority against poor and marginalised immigrant populations. Again, I say that opposition to this Enlightenment fundamentalism, isn’t moral relativism, but an ethical imperative. At this point, respecting difference is important, but so is asserting our common life across borders of race, class and religion. The fake pageantry of respect is no substitute for a genuine internationalism.
There are many weapons in the culture war, but chief among the techniques of policing thought and writing is that of offence. We are familiar with the use of the notion of offense by religious and ethnic minorities to gain identity-political purchase – from the Rushdie fatwa to the Mohammed cartoons, the martialling of sentiments of shame and abused honor have generated a lot of heat and not much light.
I believe that the right to freedom of speech trumps any right to protection from offense, and that it underlies all the other issues I’ve been speaking about. Without freedom of speech, we, as writers, can have very little impact on culture. In saying this, I’m aware that this is a prime example of a concept which has been degraded by the war on terror – that many European muslims misidentify it as a tool of Anglo-Saxon interests, a license to insult them, rather than the sole guarantee of their right to be heard.
advice for convention panelists #1
Or, my apologies to anyone who attended "SF at the Freeway’s End" and expected me to be there. It wasn't on the list on my badge. Often smaller panels are livelier ones, so I hope that was for the best.
Thursday, November 25, 2010
my LosCon schedule
Stimulating Your Muse
Where do great ideas come from and how can you nurse those creative genes without a hangover?
Will Shetterly (m), Kathy Porter, Valerie Estelle Frankel, Aaron Mason, Gary Philips
Friday 3:00 – Chicago
SF at the Freeway’s End
Heinlein’s “crooked house” was in LA, and so was the lanai apartment in Ellison’s “Shattered Like A Glass Goblin.” Bradbury’s Venus sounds like LA in February! How have local sf and fantasy writers mined the experience of living in Los Angeles for fictional purposes? Is this city a uniquely fertile source of ideas?
Tim Powers, Gary Westfahl, Gary Phillips, Will Shetterly, Ken Estes
Saturday 11:30 a.m. – Boston/Atlanta
SF Noir and Its Relationship to Crime Stories
Cody Goodfellow, Mel Gilden, Will Shetterly, James Kerwin, Bill Warren
Saturday 4:00 p.m. – Philadelphia
Fantasy and Monarchy
Many fantasy novels revolve around kings and queens, princes and princesses, tyrannical emperors and long-lost heirs to the throne. How much of fantasy’s appeal is grounded in a monarchic setting, and how can this long-standing tradition of genre be updated or refreshed, or abandoned entirely?
Sherwood Smith, Will Shetterly, Rhondi Vilott Salsitz, Lynn Maudlin, Karen Anderson
Saturday 5:30 p.m. – New Orleans
Beyond the first draft (editing, or what to expect of the second draft)
Okay, so you finished that big first draft. Is it done, or are you just getting started on the real work? Pros discuss the top tips on what to look for and how to turn that rough draft into a polished gem.
Tim Powers, Will Shetterly, Marv Wolfman, Laurel Anne Hill, Todd McCaffrey
Sunday 11:30 a.m. – Marquis 3
Shadow Unit
Find out more about Shadow Unit, the innovative, interactive, online science fiction project about a secret investigative unit at the FBI.
Emma Bull, Will Shetterly
They didn't take my suggestion for a "class and f&sf" panel, but I suspect I'll have some of the same fun on "Fantasy and Monarchy." Where it appears I'll be the token male. Which amuses me, 'cause it follows a couple of SF panels that are all-boy affairs.
We may draft some extra folks for the Shadow Unit panel.
Monday, November 22, 2010
still a driving fool
Also, it is good to be back in the Southwest. Tomorrow, the sky will be the right color.
Buddhism and violence
As an equal opportunity admirer and critic of the “faith communities” on this subject, I also have wondered how Buddhism gets its peaceful reputation. A review by Katherine Wharton of two books, Buddhist Warfare and The Six Perfections illuminates. Buddhist Warfare, says Wharton, “forms an accurate history of violence in the name of religion,” and cites sutras which shock, since they “justify killing with detailed reference to the Buddha’s central philosophical tenants. The book therefore presents a uniquely Buddhist ‘heart of darkness.’” Brian Victoria’s essay in The Six Perfections brings the issue to modern times: D. T. Suzuki (d. 1966), “the most influential proponent of Zen to the West in the twentieth century . . . gave his unqualified support to the ‘unity of Zen and the sword.’” Between ancient and modern times, as another contributor to these symposia finds and cites, was Chinese monk Yi-hiuan, who urged his hearers to “kill everything you encounter, internally as well as externally! Kill the Buddha! Kill your father and mother! Kill your closest friends!”Yes, "kill" is metaphorical in Yi-huan's advice. But most religious violence comes from people misunderstanding metaphors.
In the eyes of many apologists and observers, the Buddhist concept of “emptiness” is, from a distance, a guarantor of peace, over against the fullness of Warrior-God texts in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. But Wharton is convinced by these books that “emptiness” can and does also promote violence, and is not by itself the solution.
Sunday, November 21, 2010
quote of the day
Friday, November 19, 2010
pics of us and others in New Orleans
http://www.flickr.com/photos/35025258@N00/sets/72157625401711704/
I'm quite fond of this pic, of Ellen and Delia and Emma (and also me):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/35025258@N00/5181708379/in/set-72157625401711704/
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
Sunday, November 14, 2010
classaliciousness, my political post for this week
Links:
The Mississippi Pardons. When you think the US (in)justice system can't get worse....
The Cosmopolitan ‘Meritocracy’ and Class Stratification of Black Nationality. It's not about the rage of neoliberal antiracists, but it explains it:
This is a social layer that is insecure in its class position. It lacks the confidence exhibited by the bourgeoisie, even by the nouveau riche bourgeoisie. The propertied rulers—comprising only hundreds of families, not thousands—are a confident class (except during prerevolutionary crises or times of a rapidly accelerating breakdown of the capitalist order). Not only do they own, control, and hold the debt in perpetuity on the commanding heights of industry, banking, land, and trade. They also dominate the state and all aspects of social and political life, and finance the production of culture and the arts, including its “cutting edges.”
The meritocracy, to the contrary, is not confident. Dependent on cadging from the capitalists a portion of the wealth created by the exploited producers, these privileged aspirants to bourgeois affluence—a lifestyle they are convinced “society” owes them—nonetheless fear at some point being pushed back toward the conditions of the working classes. On the one hand, due to their very size as a stratum of society—it’s millions, if not tens of millions in the United States today—they recognize that the rulers find them useful to bolster illusions in the supposedly limitless “careers open to talent” under capitalism. At the same time, and despite their shameless self-promotion, many of them also sense that since they serve no essential economic or political functions in the production and reproduction of surplus value, they live at the forbearance of the bourgeoisie. In the end, large numbers of them are expendable, especially at times of deepening social crisis.
Saturday, November 13, 2010
Dresden Dolls and Jason Webley
I knew nothing about Jason Webley. More greatness.
Saturday, November 6, 2010
class rant of the day
If you like Rumi
Nice!
And because I just realized not everyone knows that’s high praise where I come from, this is the meaning I have in mind: “characterized by, showing, or requiring great accuracy, precision, skill, tact, care, or delicacy: nice workmanship; a nice shot; a nice handling of a crisis.”
Friday, November 5, 2010
Churchill joins Mao and Stalin in mass murder through starvation
Thursday, November 4, 2010
Zaz
Two versions of "Dans ma rue", one acoustic, one studio (with fan images):
YouTube - ZAZ - "Dans ma rue" acoustique
YouTube - ZAZ - DANS MA RUE
funny Mr. Lincoln and a race article
'They all look the same' race effect seen in the brain - life - 04 November 2010 - New Scientist
there shall be no poor among you: Deuteronomy vs. Jesus?
"For the poor shall never cease out of the land" Deuteronomy 15:11
"For ye have the poor always with you; but me ye have not always." Matthew 26:11But they don't quote all of Deuteronomy 15:11:
"For the poor shall never cease out of the land: therefore I command thee, saying, Thou shalt open thine hand wide unto thy brother, to thy poor, and to thy needy, in thy land." Deuteronomy 15:11
"...there shall be no poor among you; for the LORD shall greatly bless thee in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance to possess it." Deuteronomy 15:4As for Jesus, Matthew has a habit of making his teachings easier for rich folks. Mark gives the full version:
"For ye have the poor with you always, and whensoever ye will ye may do them good: but me ye have not always." Mark 14:7Luke is the bluntest of the Gospelers. For those who do not wish to help the poor, he warns,
"But woe unto you that are rich! for ye have received your consolation." Luke 6:24
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
Snoburbia and a book about race and class that I should read
Montgomery County mom takes a poke at her peeps is about snoburbia, the blog. I haven't made my mind up about the blog. The writer's observant, but I'm not sure she's insightful—she knows she's living in a mad society, but she's not about to start a commie stitch and bitch club. Still, I recommend snoburbia and race, and I quite liked her bit about Kung Fu classes.
Also: Book Review: Eugene Robinson's 'Disintegration: The Splintering of Black America'.
Tim Wise, time to cut the classist crap
In An Open Letter to the White Right, On the Occasion of Your Recent, Successful Temper Tantrum, you say:
And for y’all a bit lower on the economic scale, enjoy your Pabst Blue Ribbon, or whatever shitty ass beer you favor.That should be "whatever shitty ass beer you can afford."
But you'd have to have some understanding of what life is like for hard-hit working-class folks to know that.
You're generally right that racists are falling on the dungheap of history. But you don't get that what we're facing now isn't about race. Look at who the Tea Party elected: Minorities ride GOP wave to groundbreaking wins - 2012 Elections - Salon.com
It's about class now. So decide which side you want to be on.
all the best,
Will
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
even bigots must be free to speak
They came first for the communists,I'm a red, which explains why free speech matters so much to me. If capitalists don't respect free speech, I'm silenced.
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for me
and by that time no one was left to speak up.
But that quote isn't addressed to reds. It's addressed to people who oppose them. A modern equivalent for antiracism theorists would start, "They came first for the bigots, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a bigot."
Censors love a foothold, so they start with the things that the majority opposes, then use what they've gained to censor more. That's why I agree with the ACLU: lovers of free speech must speak up for a bigot's right to speak.
ETA: I wouldn't have thought of the quote if I hadn't seen it being used by one of the supporters of Wiscon's decision to cancel a speaker. The notion that Niemöller believed in silencing bad people before their ideas could spread just croggled me.
Yes, many notions croggle me.
ETA 2: This post follows from uninviting a speaker is censorship: Elizabeth Moon, Wiscon, ACLU, and more.
Chris Rock, classist creep
YouTube - Chris Rock-Niggas Vs. Black People Pt 1
He focuses on poor blacks for most of this, then gets to poor whites at the end.
Mind you, this is from 1996. But it's fascinating that he saw, in a raw, despise-the-poor way, the class divide that has 40% of black Americans saying there are now two black races.
I was reminded of his routine by David Mills: The 'Nigger' Top 10.
ETA: Note the venue. The only poor folks in there were either showing the people who could afford those tickets to their seats or waiting to clean up after the audience had left. Now, Rock is funny. But his humor here is all about class rage.