Monday, January 16, 2012

identity bigots

Yves Smith writes in Ron Paul Debate Flushes Out Gender-Baiting Right Wing Opportunists Masquerading as Progressives « naked capitalism:
...identity bigots like Pollitt apparently can’t wrap their minds around the notion that many people see themselves as citizens first and their demography second, and can and do have nuanced views based on how they weigh multiple political considerations: class, concentration of power, rule of law, civil liberties, and gender/race/sexual orientation.
To disprove the contention of identitarians that only white men could say anything good about Ron Paul, Smith links to rejections of identity politics by folks who don't fit the white male category, including Yvette Carnell in Rethinking a Rethinking – Andrew Sullivan and the Ron Paul Unendorsement |
… at the heart of the teeth gnashing are Paul’s racist newsletters and their import. For me, this would be a much tougher nut to crack if structural and/or cultural racism were still the most heinous defect in the American body politic. But in a country where indefinite detention just became the law of the land, it’s not. In a country where unmanned American drones are killing innocent children abroad, it’s not. And in a country where mortgage scammers are protected from prosecution while Americans are being foreclosed on in record numbers, it’s not. Sorry black folks, but race and racism are not the biggest issues of the 21st century and to imagine otherwise is to conflate the issue and put the needs of your community ahead of the needs of America in particular and the global community in general. In that way, it’s a selfish usurpation of the political agenda to placate the few, and it shouldn’t be tolerated by black people of conscience.


  1. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Doesn't mean I'd buy the clock. Or vote for it.

    1. The point isn't "Vote for Ron Paul." The point is "Extremely important issues are being ignored by complacent Democrats."